ISM 2.0, explained: the component scheme, the data-centre promise and what is still missing
The February Budget announced a second version of the India Semiconductor Mission and raised the electronics component outlay by more than 80%. The money is committed; the rules are not yet written.
By Sanjay Mehra · Technology Editor, Technology

The short version
- The Union Budget statement of February 1 announced ISM 2.0, a successor to the semiconductor mission launched in 2021.
- The electronics component manufacturing allocation was raised from about ₹22,000 crore to about ₹40,000 crore.
- The statement also carried a long-dated tax treatment for data centre and cloud infrastructure.
A Budget line is not a scheme. When the finance minister announced ISM 2.0 on February 1, the government committed to a second generation of the India Semiconductor Mission, with the electronics component programme expanded and a separate, much longer-dated promise for data centres and cloud capacity. The headline figures came from the statement itself; the machinery to deliver them has to be built afterwards.
Why components and not chips
The first mission focused on fabrication, which is the part of the semiconductor chain that requires the most capital and the most patience. Components is the step around it: packaging, substrates, printed circuit boards, passive parts. India has an assembly base that already exports phones and laptops, and the argument for the expanded allocation is that assembly without component manufacturing imports the value it should be creating at home.
- The electronics component manufacturing allocation moves from roughly ₹22,000 crore to roughly ₹40,000 crore.
- ISM 2.0 is presented as a successor programme rather than a top-up to the existing mission.
- A long-dated tax treatment for data centre and cloud infrastructure accompanies the hardware push.
The data centre element is the part most likely to be discussed in Bengaluru and Chennai before it is discussed in the electronics clusters. Compute capacity is now a location decision with a tax component to it, and a multi-decade tax treatment changes the arithmetic of that decision in a way a one-off subsidy does not.
What the statement does not contain is as important as what it does. It does not set a notification schedule for the revised guidelines, name the eligible applicants or specify how the component outlay will be split across categories of firms. Until those rules arrive, the number is a commitment rather than a claim on money, and companies planning capacity decisions on it are working from a press release.
Sources — 2 references
These are the published sources this article was established against. NOT SCRIPTED wrote the text above; the sources below are credited to their own publishers.
About the byline
Sanjay Mehra
Semiconductors, AI infrastructure and Indian tech policy. Believes every deck needs a supply-chain slide.
Read about the NOT SCRIPTED newsroom and how our bylines work.
Related coverage

Two states have now written data centre policies. Here is what they are actually buying

Pax Silica: what joining a silicon coalition would and would not fix for India

AI Impact Summit ends with the New Delhi Declaration, backed by 88 nations
