The Hormuz risk premium is now a number in the oil price, and the number is small
Brent settled at $70.71 on January 29, the highest since July, on fear of US strikes. The premium a bank has actually put on that fear is $3 to $4 a barrel. That gap is worth understanding.
By Leila Haddad · Geopolitics Correspondent, Geopolitics

The short version
- Brent settled at $70.71 a barrel on January 29, 2026, up 3.4%, its highest since July, with West Texas Intermediate at $65.42.
- Citigroup analysts estimated the escalation premium at $3 to $4 a barrel, with Brent potentially reaching $72 over three months.
- About 20 million barrels a day of oil pass through the Strait of Hormuz, and Iran warned ships at sea it would run a live-firing drill in the strait the following week.
On January 29, 2026 Brent crude settled at $70.71 a barrel, up $2.31 or 3.4%, its highest close since July, with West Texas Intermediate at $65.42. The stated cause was the possibility that the United States would attack Iran. That is a three-session rally driven by rhetoric rather than by barrels: nothing about Iranian production changed that day, and roughly 20 million barrels a day continue to move through the Strait of Hormuz.
- Brent settlement, January 29: $70.71 a barrel, up $2.31 on the day.
- West Texas Intermediate settlement: $65.42, up $2.21.
- Oil transiting the Strait of Hormuz: about 20 million barrels a day, roughly a fifth of world supply.
- Iranian production: around 3.2 to 3.3 million barrels a day, about 3% of global supply.
- Citigroup's estimate of the escalation premium: $3 to $4 a barrel.
- Citi's three-month Brent target on further escalation: as high as $72 a barrel.
What is actually new
Three things moved in the same week. President Trump deployed the Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group to the region and warned on social media that Iran would face something worse than last year's strikes unless it negotiated on its nuclear programme. Reuters reported that he was weighing targeted strikes on Iranian security forces and leaders. And the Associated Press reported, citing two Pakistani security officials and the EOS Risk Group, that Iran had warned ships at sea that it planned a drill the following week involving live firing in Hormuz. A naval exercise with live ordnance in a two-mile-wide strait is a different proposition from a rhetorical exercise.
The options market read the same way. Bullish call additions grew at the fastest rate in at least six years, and bullish calls traded above bearish puts for the longest stretch in roughly fourteen months. Meanwhile the EU sanctioned Iran over the crackdown on protests, a second source of pressure that most daily price commentary did not weight heavily. A weaker dollar and signals of steady rates from the Federal Reserve contributed to the rise as well, which is a useful reminder that not every dollar of a geopolitical rally is geopolitical.
Sources — 7 references
These are the published sources this article was established against. NOT SCRIPTED wrote the text above; the sources below are credited to their own publishers.
- Reuters (opens in a new tab)
- CNBC (opens in a new tab)
- The National (opens in a new tab)
- RTÉ (opens in a new tab)
- World Oil (Bloomberg) (opens in a new tab)
- Bloomberg (opens in a new tab)
- Baird Maritime (Reuters) (opens in a new tab)
The live-firing drill report originates with the Associated Press via trade press; it is attributed rather than stated as established fact.
About the byline
Leila Haddad
Energy security, shipping chokepoints and the Gulf.
Read about the NOT SCRIPTED newsroom and how our bylines work.
Related coverage

Hormuz is open again. The oil market it shut has not reclosed cleanly.

Strikes on Iran push oil towards $70 and reopen the Hormuz question

Iran says the Strait of Hormuz will not reopen until its conditions are met
