A Qatar-linked LNG tanker was hit in the Strait of Hormuz, and the waterway's risk premium did not soften
Bloomberg reported the strike on Saturday; CNBC reported that tankers near Oman were coming under fire the same day. Neither identified who fired, and no casualty account was published.
By Leila Haddad · Geopolitics Correspondent, Geopolitics

The short version
- Bloomberg reported that an LNG carrier linked to Qatar was struck by a projectile in the Strait of Hormuz.
- CNBC reported separately that commercial tankers near Oman came under fire on the same day.
- Neither report named an attacker or published a casualty count.
An LNG tanker linked to Qatar was struck by a projectile in the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, according to a Bloomberg report that cited people familiar with the matter. Hours earlier, CNBC had reported that commercial tankers sailing near Oman were coming under fire.
Neither report identified an attacker. Neither published a crew casualty count, a flag state account or a technical description of the damage. For a stretch of water where almost every commercial movement is now watched by states and insurers, the absence of those details is itself informative.
Why a gas carrier is a different problem from an oil tanker
The strait is the only sea route between the Persian Gulf and the open ocean, and its traffic is not fungible. The Congressional Research Service put roughly a fifth of global petroleum liquids consumption and about a fifth of global LNG trade through Hormuz in 2023, and found that nearly 84% of the crude and condensate moving through it in the first half of 2024 was bound for Asian markets.
- About 20 million barrels of oil a day pass through Hormuz, by the Congressional Research Service's estimate.
- Roughly one-fifth of seaborne LNG trade uses the same route.
- The Asian share of crude and condensate shipments through the strait was close to 84% in early 2024.
A strike on a gas carrier lands on a different set of buyers than a strike on a tanker. LNG cargoes are contracted years ahead and delivered to a small number of regasification terminals, so the substitution question at the buyer's end is narrower and longer than it is for crude.
The price of that uncertainty has been visible in insurance rather than in benchmarks. CNBC reported in March that war-risk premiums on Gulf voyages had risen from a baseline near 0.125% of hull value to as much as 0.4% on the worst routes — a fourfold to sixfold increase, and the kind of cost that does not come down simply because a month passes quietly.
The Asian importers who dominate this route are the party most exposed in the immediate term. Japan, South Korea and India take most of the volume that moves east out of the Gulf, and the available substitutes are limited in the same month in which the risk has risen.
- Confirmation of the vessel, its flag state and whether it is being towed.
- Any change in quoted war-risk premiums for voyages through the strait.
- Whether the reported firing near Oman extends to traffic well outside Hormuz.
Sources — 4 references
These are the published sources this article was established against. NOT SCRIPTED wrote the text above; the sources below are credited to their own publishers.
About the byline
Leila Haddad
Energy security, shipping chokepoints and the Gulf.
Read about the NOT SCRIPTED newsroom and how our bylines work.
Related coverage

Iran says the Strait of Hormuz will not reopen until its conditions are met

A dry bulk vessel was struck near the Strait of Hormuz and the crew abandoned ship

Crude fell about 16% in a day when a two-week US-Iran pause put the Strait of Hormuz back on the board
